Mortgage Professionals Can Help In Deciding the Conventional or FHA Loan Decision

Mortgage professionals are a great resource when seeking a home mortgage. They guide you through the entire process but they also should be educating the prospective home buyer on the different loan packages available. One such area is the conventional loan program versus the FHA loan program; many have heard the different terms but may not understand that there is a difference between the two types of loans. This article takes a look at the main differences between the two.

The first difference a consumer will notice is the FHA loan requires a lower down payment for the mortgage as compared to a conventional loan. The FHA minimum down payment is 3.5% compared to a minimum of 10% for a conventional loan. As part of the down payment the FHA program will allow a consumer to accept a gift to cover the down payment but in general conventional lenders will not allow this. One key to both of these types of loans is that having a down payment that is less than 20% requires that mortgage insurance be paid to help lenders recoup some of the money in case of default. This private mortgage insurance (PMI) will definitely increase your monthly payment so keep that in mind when figuring your monthly budget. The good news is that when you have reached 20% equity in your home, you can request to have the PMI cancelled. Doing this can save the homeowner $50-$100 a month.

FHA loans also have more relaxed credit guidelines as compared to a conventional package. The FHA program may be the one for those who have minor credit issues compared to conventional loans where credit scores can significantly affect interest rates based on the scores that are below 720. Keep in mind that these lenders each have different standards to what their cut off is for credit scores.

FHA loans are typically 30 year mortgages and a home buyer will not find the flexibility of options that a conventional lender can offer to those that qualify. These options might include different term lengths from 10 – 30 years and adjustable rate mortgages (ARM’s). Also noteworthy is that FHA loans have loan limits set by area and are typically less than one would find using conventional loans. What this translates to is if someone who is trying to obtain a FHA loan where the mortgage exceeds the limits the only options are to either provide a larger down payment or to acquire a conventional loan.

While there are other differences between the two types of mortgages discussed here, the main points are listed above and can help with the initial decision making process when sitting down with mortgage professionals. Educating yourself is the key to making the right decision when trying to decide the type of loan that makes sense for you.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

The Rise and Fall of 100% Mortgages

100% mortgages were hugely popular mortgage products for UK house buyers throughout the property boom years which covered the period from the turn of the millennium through to the credit crunch crash in the autumn of 2008. They enabled people to purchase a property without having to save and pay a hefty deposit at the point of purchase as the mortgage loan would cover the full value of the property being purchased.

People who would otherwise be renting were enabled to get onto the property ladder rather than continue to pay rent to a landlord, which many considered to be ‘dead money’. The vast number of people who purchased their first property in the first seven years of the new millennium by utilising a 100% mortgage may not otherwise have been able to get on to the property ladder at all had this type of mortgage product not existed. In fact, it has been said that as many as 40% of people who purchased their first property in the years proceeding the credit crunch would not have been able to do so at all under post credit crunch lending conditions.

However, despite the obvious benefits of 100% mortgages and their rise to popularity, they have always been inherently risky mortgage products, both for borrower and lender. Mortgage lenders and borrowers are protected by the equity margin in a property. That is the margin of value over and above any mortgage or loans secured against the property. With 100% mortgages there is no margin of equity at all, as the mortgage is equal to 100% of the property value. Therefore, if the property goes down in value the outstanding mortgage will be greater than the value of the property itself. This is known as ‘negative equity’, and means that the property asset is worth less than the mortgage secured against it. This is clearly not a good situation for either the borrower or the mortgage provider.

During the boom years mortgage lenders had a voracious appetite for lending, and competition for new lending business was great. Lenders started to take more and more risks in order to win business. The rise of 100% mortgages came about during this boom period, when lenders cared more about securing new lending business than the risks they were taking with some of the mortgage products they were offering. It can also be said that borrowers also turned a blind eye to the possibility of house prices turning, and therefore were willing to take the risk of purchasing a property without a deposit. People wanted to buy properties, expected them to continue to rise in value and many people have suffered since that all changed as a result of the credit crunch.

Although 100% mortgages have not been ‘banned’, there are currently no 100% mortgage products available to UK borrowers and this trend looks set to continue. If a lender were to launch a new 100% mortgage product, it would be very controversial. However, despite allowing mortgage lenders to offer higher loan to value mortgages if they wish, the regulator has now put into place more stringent capital adequacy requirements which make this type of mortgage much more expensive and far less viable for mortgage providers.

Will 100% mortgages ever return? It is unlikely in the foreseeable future, but who knows what may happen once the economy is back on track and the credit crunch is a distant memory. One thing is for sure, if 100% mortgages did return there would be lots of first time buyers ready to utilise them again. But for now, they are gone and that is probably for good.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments